Competing versions of the truth
Teams keep process maps, policies and responsibilities in separate files. Employees cannot reliably find the approved way to work.
Teams keep process maps, policies and responsibilities in separate files. Employees cannot reliably find the approved way to work.
A published rule does not explain which activity, role or approval should put it into practice.
A revised procedure can affect roles, documents and running workflows without a shared review of those dependencies.
HOW IT WORKS
People own decisions. Systems carry out configured actions. Any AI assistance must use authorized context and produce work for review.
Process owner
Map the process hierarchy and appoint accountable owners. Identify which activities need a common standard.
Policy steward
Link policies, roles, terms and control requirements to the activities they govern.
Reviewers
Review process models and documents, resolve comments and publish a controlled version for employees.
Delivery team
Configure selected workflows and approval responsibilities in BPA. Confirm integrations and exceptions before release.
Process owner
Review change requests and operational feedback. Where event data is available, compare actual paths with the approved model using BPI. The process owner approves the next version.
EBPA maintains process hierarchies, linked policies, role responsibilities and controlled versions.
Explore EBPA →BPA applies selected routing and approval rules to operational workflows.
Explore BPA →BPI compares actual execution with an approved process model when suitable event data is available.
Explore BPI →FlowBuddy can assist with process review and rule-related work using authorized context. People confirm the output and retain approval authority.
Explore FlowBuddy →Business scenario · Supplier qualification policy update
A FOCUSED START
Start with one process family, an accountable owner and an inventory of current policies. Agree the approval authority, document version rules and the systems affected by a change.
Track ownership coverage, overdue reviews, use of current versions and exceptions against an agreed baseline.
Implementation scope and outcomes depend on the process, data, systems and team. Agree success criteria during discovery.
YOUR QUESTIONS
No. EBPA organizes the standard and its relationships. Executable routing, integrations and exception handling must be configured and tested in BPA.
Define shared standards and permitted local variations with named owners. Model their scope and review rights before configuring access.
An optional FlowBuddy scenario can help prepare process work from authorized context. Owners still review the output; AI is not required for this governance solution.
Bring your team, your systems, and the work you want to improve.